Teams, tokenomics and technical reviews about the Clout $CLOUT project ILO/IDO are in this article.
They describe themselves:
CLOUT is a deflationary static rewards DeFi token that aims to be a potential boon for yield farmers and investors alike.
Launchpad AMM: PancakeswapV2
Contract address: 0x0fFB09e25d2Cb7D56EF3eA7Fac08756Dfb579208
Presales have some risks. Please DYOR (do your own research)
|Liquidity Lock||90% BNB raised liquidity lock|
Lock duration: 6 months
|Participation||Open to anyone|
|Max Spend per Account||0,5 BNB|
|Presale Price||1.600.000 CLOUT / per BNB|
|Listing Price||1.120.000 CLOUT / per BNB|
|Start||Approx: Tue 11 May 20:51|
|End||Approx: Wed 12 May 05:50|
Total supply: 1.000.000.000 CLOUT
it is good
- %90 BNB raised liquidity lock
- Listing price is higher than presale price
it is not good
- 6 months liquidity lock time
- No KYC
- No audit
About the team
From White Paper
- 12% Fee:
- 4% marketing and team
- 3% liquidity
- 3% redistribution/burn (burn happens here as burn wallet receives redistribution fee)
- 2% charity
- Yield Farming, Staking and Pools: Use CLOUT to stake, put into pools and use as collateral, making it an asset with various use cases.
Clout planned to make the presale in dxsale, but gave up due to technical problems dxsale was experiencing. 90% BNB raised is very good but 6 month lock time is not good enough.
23,5 % of total supply was burned (check). Dev wallet has %11 of total supply. it is big. part of it should be locked.
The fee is shown as 12% on one page of the website and 11% on the other page. I don’t know exactly which one is right.
Softcap is same as hardcap(250 BNB). It’s an approach we’re not usually used to seeing. Clout doesn’t want to be listed with a low softcap. Because a low softcap means low liquidity. This may cause sudden price decreases at the beginning of the listing.
For projects whose main point is based on smart contract features, audit is more important. Because the project does not promise any product.
250 BNB collected. hit hardcap. success